Garden Bazil, Or Sweet Bazil

Ocimum basilicum

HRB-0025Entry “GARDEN BAZIL, OR SWEET BAZIL” in the 1850 textIn Culpeper’s 1652 first edition

Open in the Concordance

Old claims, quoted verbatim: not medical advice. A warning sits above the claims and never hides them; no warning does not mean safe, only that no source here has flagged the plant.

Substance of concernEFSA: 1,8-cineole, Camphor, Safrole and 4 moreEFSA’s list of substances, not a danger rating. Checked 26 October 2026.

Historical correspondence. Ruled by Mars, by Culpeper. A traditional astrological assignment, kept apart from the modern evidence; it is not a finding.

What it does, in Culpeper: Counter-poison

Culpeper’s claims about it: 3, under 3 headings, 1 where he says it harms or causes

  1. Hilarius, a French physician, affirms upon his own knowledge, that an acquaintance of his, by common smelling to it, had a scorpion bred in his brain.
    QUO-000273Papers and the EMA’s verdict, in the Concordance
  2. Being applied to the place bitten by venomous beasts, or stung by a wasp or hornet, it speedily draws the poison to it;
    QUO-000937Papers and the EMA’s verdict, in the Concordance
  3. Stings and Venomous BitesCLM-0024211850 index, p. 17
    Being applied to the place bitten by venomous beasts, or stung by a wasp or hornet, it speedily draws the poison to it;
    QUO-000937Papers and the EMA’s verdict, in the Concordance

Source

Nicholas Culpeper, The Complete Herbal, a new edition (London: Thomas Kelly, 1850). Project Gutenberg eBook #49513. SRC-CUL-1850

Quotations are verbatim from the 1850 text, line breaks joined. Modern research and the European regulator’s verdict on each claim are on the Concordance page, kept apart from this historical record.