The Cherry-Tree

Prunus cerasus

HRB-0068Entry “THE CHERRY-TREE” in the 1850 textIn Culpeper’s 1652 first edition

Open in the Concordance

Old claims, quoted verbatim: not medical advice. A warning sits above the claims and never hides them; no warning does not mean safe, only that no source here has flagged the plant.

Culpeper’s claims about it: 5, under 5 headings

  1. the tart or sour are more pleasing to an hot stomach, procure appetite to meat, to help and cut tough phlegm, and gross humours;
    QUO-000081Papers and the EMA’s verdict, in the Concordance
  2. CoughsCLM-000555
    The gum of the Cherry-tree, desolved in wine is good for a cold, cough, and hoarseness of the throat;
    QUO-000467Papers and the EMA’s verdict, in the Concordance
  3. GravelCLM-000806
    mends the colour in the face, sharpens the eye-sight, provokes appetite, and helps to break and expel the stone, and dissolved, the water thereof is much used to break the stone, and to expel gravel and wind.
    QUO-000624Papers and the EMA’s verdict, in the Concordance
  4. HoarsenessCLM-000835
    The gum of the Cherry-tree, desolved in wine is good for a cold, cough, and hoarseness of the throat;
    QUO-000467Papers and the EMA’s verdict, in the Concordance
  5. StoneCLM-001690
    mends the colour in the face, sharpens the eye-sight, provokes appetite, and helps to break and expel the stone, and dissolved, the water thereof is much used to break the stone, and to expel gravel and wind.
    QUO-000624Papers and the EMA’s verdict, in the Concordance

Source

Nicholas Culpeper, The Complete Herbal, a new edition (London: Thomas Kelly, 1850). Project Gutenberg eBook #49513. SRC-CUL-1850

Quotations are verbatim from the 1850 text, line breaks joined. Modern research and the European regulator’s verdict on each claim are on the Concordance page, kept apart from this historical record.