Eyebright

Euphrasia officinalis

HRB-0114Entry “EYEBRIGHT” in the 1850 textIn Culpeper’s 1652 first edition

Open in the Concordance

Old claims, quoted verbatim: not medical advice. A warning sits above the claims and never hides them; no warning does not mean safe, only that no source here has flagged the plant.

Historical correspondence. Ruled by Sun, by Culpeper. A traditional astrological assignment, kept apart from the modern evidence; it is not a finding.

Culpeper’s claims about it: 4, under 4 headings

  1. Being used any of the ways, it also helps a weak brain, or memory.
    QUO-000285Papers and the EMA’s verdict, in the Concordance
  2. The juice or distilled water of Eyebright, taken inwardly in white wine or broth, or dropped into the eyes for divers days together, helps all infirmities of the eyes that cause dimness of sight.
    QUO-000524Papers and the EMA’s verdict, in the Concordance
  3. EyesCLM-0022961850 index, pp. 71, 396
    The juice or distilled water of Eyebright, taken inwardly in white wine or broth, or dropped into the eyes for divers days together, helps all infirmities of the eyes that cause dimness of sight.
    QUO-000524Papers and the EMA’s verdict, in the Concordance
  4. Being used any of the ways, it also helps a weak brain, or memory.
    QUO-000285Papers and the EMA’s verdict, in the Concordance

Source

Nicholas Culpeper, The Complete Herbal, a new edition (London: Thomas Kelly, 1850). Project Gutenberg eBook #49513. SRC-CUL-1850

Quotations are verbatim from the 1850 text, line breaks joined. Modern research and the European regulator’s verdict on each claim are on the Concordance page, kept apart from this historical record.