Pearl Trefoil

No Latin name recorded

HRB-0304Entry “PEARL TREFOIL” in the 1850 textNot in the 1652 first edition: added by Culpeper in 1653 or by a later editor up to 1850

Open in the ConcordanceCopy permanent linkCopy citation

Old claims, quoted verbatim: not medical advice. A warning sits above the claims and never hides them; no warning does not mean safe, only that no source here has flagged the plant.

Culpeper’s claims about it: 1, under 1 heading

1. Dimness of SightCLM-0022861850 index, p. 186

   Listed in the 1850 index; the herbal entry has no sentence naming this complaint. No quotation is recorded.

   Papers and the EMA’s verdict, in the ConcordanceCopy permanent linkCopy citation

Source

Nicholas Culpeper, The Complete Herbal, a new edition (London: Thomas Kelly, 1850). Project Gutenberg eBook #49513. SRC-CUL-1850

Quotations are verbatim from the 1850 text, line breaks joined. Modern research and the European regulator’s verdict on each claim are on the Concordance page, kept apart from this historical record.